SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
3
Most read
6
Most read
Reporting Statistics in Psychology

This document contains general guidelines for the reporting of statistics in psychology re-
search. The details of statistical reporting vary slightly among different areas of science and
also among different journals.


                                           General Guidelines

Rounding Numbers
For numbers greater than 100, report to the nearest whole number (e.g., M = 6254). For
numbers between 10 and 100, report to one decimal place (e.g., M = 23.4). For numbers be-
tween 0.10 and 10, report to two decimal places (e.g., M = 4.34, SD = 0.93). For numbers
less than 0.10, report to three decimal places, or however many digits you need to have a
non-zero number (e.g., M = 0.014, SEM = 0.0004).

   For numbers...                      Round to...                      SPSS    Report

Greater than 100        Whole number                                1034.963   1035
10 - 100                1 decimal place                             11.4378    11.4
0.10 - 10               2 decimal places                            4.3682     4.37
0.001 - 0.10            3 decimal places                            0.0352     0.035
Less than 0.001         As many digits as needed for non-zero       0.00038    0.0004

Do not report any decimal places if you are reporting something that can only be a whole
number. For example, the number of participants in a study should be reported as N = 5, not
N = 5.0.
Report exact p-values (not p < .05), even for non-significant results. Round as above, unless
SPSS gives a p-value of .000; then report p < .001. Two-tailed p-values are assumed. If
you are reporting a one-tailed p-value, you must say so.
Omit the leading zero from p-values, correlation coefficients (r), partial eta-squared (ηp2), and
other numbers that cannot ever be greater than 1.0 (e.g., p = .043, not p = 0.043).

Statistical Abbreviations
Abbreviations using Latin letters, such as mean (M) and standard deviation (SD), should be
italicised, while abbreviations using Greek letters, such as partial eta-squared (ηp2), should
not be italicised and can be written out in full if you cannot use Greek letters. There should
be a space before and after equal signs. The abbreviations should only be used inside of pa-
rentheses; spell out the names otherwise.
Inferential statistics should generally be reported in the style of:
“statistic(degrees of freedom) = value, p = value, effect size statistic = value”

            Statistic                                         Example

Mean and standard deviation     M = 3.45, SD = 1.21
Mann-Whitney                    U = 67.5, p = .034, r = .38
Wilcoxon signed-ranks           Z = 4.21, p < .001
Sign test                       Z = 3.47, p = .001
t-test                          t(19) = 2.45, p = .031, d = 0.54
ANOVA                           F(2, 1279) = 6.15, p = .002, ηp2 = 0.010
Pearson’s correlation           r(1282) = .13, p < .001




                                                          1
Reporting Statistics in Psychology

                                   Descriptive Statistics
Means and standard deviations should be given either in the text or in a table, but not both.




      The average age of participants was 25.5 years (SD = 7.94).
      The age of participants ranged from 18 to 70 years (M = 25.5, SD = 7.94). Age was
      non-normally distributed, with skewness of 1.87 (SE = 0.05) and kurtosis of 3.93
      (SE = 0.10)
      Participants were 98 men and 132 women aged 17 to 25 years (men: M = 19.2,
      SD = 2.32; women: M = 19.6, SD = 2.54).


                                    Non-parametric tests
Do not report means and standard deviations for non-parametric tests. Report the median
and range in the text or in a table. The statistics U and Z should be capitalised and italicised.
A measure of effect size, r, can be calculated by dividing Z by the square root of N
(r = Z / √N).

Mann-Whitney Test (2 Independent Samples...)




      A Mann-Whitney test indicated that self-rated attractiveness was greater for women
      who were not using oral contraceptives (Mdn = 5) than for women who were using oral
      contraceptives (Mdn = 4), U = 67.5, p = .034, r = .38.

Wilcoxon Signed-ranks Test (2 Related Samples...)




      A Wilcoxon Signed-ranks test indicated that femininity was preferred more in female
      faces (Mdn = 0.85) than in male faces (Mdn = 0.65), Z = 4.21, p < .001, r = .76.
                                                2
Reporting Statistics in Psychology

Sign Test (2 Related Samples...)




     A sign test indicated that femininity was preferred more in female faces than in male
     faces, Z = 3.47, p = .001.


                                           T-tests
Report degrees of freedom in parentheses. The statistics t, p and Cohen’s d should be re-
ported and italicised.

One-sample t-test




     One-sample t-test indicated that femininity preferences were greater than the chance
     level of 3.5 for female faces (M = 4.50, SD = 0.70), t(30) = 8.01, p < .001, d = 1.44, but
     not for male faces (M = 3.46, SD = 0.73), t(30) = -0.32, p = .75, d = 0.057.
     The number of masculine faces chosen out of 20 possible was compared to the
     chance value of 10 using a one-sample t-test. Masculine faces were chosen more
     often than chance, t(76) = 4.35, p = .004, d = 0.35.

Paired-samples t-test
Report paired-samples t-tests in the same way as one-sample t-tests.




     A paired-samples t-test indicated that scores were significantly higher for the pathogen
     subscale (M = 26.4, SD = 7.41) than for the sexual subscale (M = 18.0, SD = 9.49),
     t(721) = 23.3, p < .001, d = 0.87.

                                               3
Reporting Statistics in Psychology

      Scores on the pathogen subscale (M = 26.4, SD = 7.41) were higher than scores on
      the sexual subscale (M = 18.0, SD = 9.49), t(721) = 23.3, p < .001, d = 0.87. A one-
      tailed p-value is reported due to the strong prediction of this effect.

Independent-samples t-test




      An independent-samples t-test indicated that scores were significantly higher for
      women (M = 27.0, SD = 7.21) than for men (M = 24.2, SD = 7.69), t(734) = 4.30,
      p < .001, d = 0.35.
If Levene’s test for equality of variances is significant, report the statistics for the row equal
variances not assumed with the altered degrees of freedom rounded to the nearest whole
number.
      Scores on the pathogen subscale were higher for women (M = 27.0, SD = 7.21) than
      for men (M = 24.2, SD = 7.69), t(340) = 4.30, p < .001, d = 0.35. Levene’s test
      indicated unequal variances (F = 3.56, p = .043), so degrees of freedom were adjusted
      from 734 to 340.


                                             ANOVAs
ANOVAs have two degrees of freedom to report. Report the between-groups df first and the
within-groups df second, separated by a comma and a space (e.g., F(1, 237) = 3.45). The
measure of effect size, partial eta-squared (ηp2), may be written out or abbreviated, omits the
leading zero and is not italicised.

One-way ANOVAs and Post-hocs




      Analysis of variance showed a main effect of self-rated attractiveness (SRA) on
      preferences for femininity in female faces, F(2, 1279) = 6.15, p = .002, ηp2 = .010. Post-
      hoc analyses using Tukey’s HSD indicated that femininity preferences were lower for
      participants with low SRA than for participants with average SRA (p = .014) and high
      SRA (p = .004), but femininity preferences did not differ significantly between
      participants with average and high SRA (p = .82).




                                                  4
Reporting Statistics in Psychology

2-way Factorial ANOVAs




      A 3x2 ANOVA with self-rated attractiveness (low, average, high) and oral contraceptive
      use (true, false) as between-subjects factors revealed a main effects of SRA,
      F(2, 1276) = 6.11, p = .002, ηp2 = .009, and oral contraceptive use, F(1, 1276) = 4.38, p
      = .037, ηp2 = 0.003. These main effects were not qualified by an interaction between
      SRA and oral contraceptive use, F(2, 1276) = 0.43, p = .65, ηp2 = .001.

3-way ANOVAs and Higher
Although some textbooks suggest that you report all main effects and interactions, even if not
significant, this reduces the understandability of the results of a complex design (i.e. 3-way or
higher). Report all significant effects and all predicted effects, even if not significant. If there
are more than two non-significant effects that are irrelevant to your main hypotheses (e.g.
you predicted an interaction among three factors, but did not predict any main effects or 2-
way interactions), you can summarise them as in the example below.




      A mixed-design ANOVA with sex of face (male, female) as a within-subjects factor and
      self-rated attractiveness (low, average, high) and oral contraceptive use (true, false) as
      between-subjects factors revealed a main effect of sex of face, F(1, 1276) = 1372,
      p < .001, ηp2 = .52. This was qualified by interactions between sex of face and SRA,
      F(2, 1276) = 6.90, p = .001, ηp2 = .011, and between sex of face and oral contraceptive
      use, F(1, 1276) = 5.02, p = .025, ηp2 = .004. The predicted interaction among sex of
      face, SRA and oral contraceptive use was not significant, F(2, 1276) = 0.06, p = .94,
      ηp2 < .001. All other main effects and interactions were non-significant and irrelevant to
      our hypotheses, all F ≤ 0.94, p ≥ .39, ηp2 ≤ .001.

Violations of Sphericity and Greenhouse-Geisser Corrections
ANOVAs are not robust to violations of sphericity, but can be easily corrected. For each
within-subjects factor with more than two levels, check if Mauchly’s test is significant. If so,
report chi-squared (χ2), degrees of freedom, p and epsilon (ε) as below and report the
Greenhouse-Geisser corrected values for any effects involving this factor (rounded to the
appropriate decimal place). SPSS will report a chi-squared of .000 and no p-value for within-
subjects factors with only two levels; corrections are not needed.




                                                 5
Reporting Statistics in Psychology




   Data were analysed using a mixed-design ANOVA with a within-subjects factor of
   subscale (pathogen, sexual, moral) and a between-subject factor of sex (male, female).
   Mauchly’s test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been violated
   (χ2(2) = 16.8, p < .001), therefore degrees of freedom were corrected using
   Greenhouse-Geisser estimates of sphericity (ε = 0.98). Main effects of subscale,
   F(1.91, 1350.8) = 378, p < .001, ηp2 = .35, and sex, F(1, 709) = 78.8, p < .001, ηp2 = .
   10, were qualified by an interaction between subscale and sex, F(1.91, 1351) = 30.4,
   p < .001, ηp2 = .041.

ANCOVA




   An ANCOVA [between-subjects factor: sex (male, female); covariate: age] revealed no
   main effects of sex, F(1, 732) = 2.00, p = .16, ηp2 = .003, or age, F(1, 732) = 3.25,
   p = .072, ηp2 = .004, and no interaction between sex and age, F(1, 732) = 0.016,
   p = .90, ηp2 < .001.
   The predicted main effect of sex was not significant, F(1, 732) = 2.00, p = .16,
   ηp2 = .003, nor was the predicted main effect of age, F(1, 732) = 3.25, p = .072,
   ηp2 = .004. The interaction between sex and age were also not significant,
   F(1, 732) = 0.016, p = .90, ηp2 < .001.




                                            6
Reporting Statistics in Psychology



                                         Correlations
Italicise r and p. Omit the leading zero from r.




      Preferences for femininity in male and female faces were positively correlated,
      Pearson’s r(1282) = .13, p < .001.



                                          References
American Psychological Association. (2005). Concise Rules of APA Style. Washington, DC:
     APA Publications.
Field, A. P., & Hole, G. J. (2003). How to design and report experiments. London: Sage Pub-
       lications.




                                                   7

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Reporting an ANCOVA
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Reporting a single sample t test
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Regression analysis on SPSS
AntimDevMishraMTechE
 
PPTX
Reporting a partial correlation in apa
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
J P Verma
 
PPTX
Reporting a paired sample t -test
Amit Sharma
 
PPTX
Estimating a Population Proportion
Long Beach City College
 
PPTX
Reporting pearson correlation in apa
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Reporting a multiple linear regression in APA
Amit Sharma
 
PDF
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Kaori Kubo Germano, PhD
 
PPTX
Reporting an independent sample t- test
Amit Sharma
 
PPTX
Reporting Pearson Correlation Test of Independence in APA
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
1. Introduction to Survival analysis
Ghada Abu sheasha
 
PPTX
Reporting Mann Whitney U Test in APA
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Two-way Mixed Design with SPSS
J P Verma
 
PPTX
Reporting a one-way anova
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Reporting a multiple linear regression in apa
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
How to calculate power in statistics
Stat Analytica
 
PDF
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
naranbatn
 
PPTX
Full Lecture Presentation on ANOVA
StevegellKololi
 
Reporting an ANCOVA
Ken Plummer
 
Reporting a single sample t test
Ken Plummer
 
Regression analysis on SPSS
AntimDevMishraMTechE
 
Reporting a partial correlation in apa
Ken Plummer
 
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
J P Verma
 
Reporting a paired sample t -test
Amit Sharma
 
Estimating a Population Proportion
Long Beach City College
 
Reporting pearson correlation in apa
Ken Plummer
 
Reporting a multiple linear regression in APA
Amit Sharma
 
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Kaori Kubo Germano, PhD
 
Reporting an independent sample t- test
Amit Sharma
 
Reporting Pearson Correlation Test of Independence in APA
Ken Plummer
 
1. Introduction to Survival analysis
Ghada Abu sheasha
 
Reporting Mann Whitney U Test in APA
Ken Plummer
 
Two-way Mixed Design with SPSS
J P Verma
 
Reporting a one-way anova
Ken Plummer
 
Reporting a multiple linear regression in apa
Ken Plummer
 
How to calculate power in statistics
Stat Analytica
 
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
naranbatn
 
Full Lecture Presentation on ANOVA
StevegellKololi
 

Viewers also liked (18)

ODP
Power, Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, & Academic Integrity
James Neill
 
PDF
Applied statistics lecture_8
Daria Bogdanova
 
PDF
Sp report
simpsonchin
 
PDF
Psychlogy report
Jordon Wong
 
PDF
Social Psychology Research Report
TamZhaoWei
 
PDF
Descriptive Statistics
CIToolkit
 
PDF
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Daire Hooper
 
PPTX
Parametric or non parametric relationship practice problems
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Predictive or arbitrary relationship practice problems
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
What is a one sample wilcoxon test
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Tutorial normal v skew distributions
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Quickreminder nature of the data (relationship)
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Tutorial parametric v. non-parametric
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Reporting a paired sample t test
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA
Ken Plummer
 
PPTX
Statistical analysis using spss
jpcagphil
 
PPTX
Statistical Analysis
Stephen Taylor
 
PPTX
Reporting a non parametric Friedman test in APA
Ken Plummer
 
Power, Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, & Academic Integrity
James Neill
 
Applied statistics lecture_8
Daria Bogdanova
 
Sp report
simpsonchin
 
Psychlogy report
Jordon Wong
 
Social Psychology Research Report
TamZhaoWei
 
Descriptive Statistics
CIToolkit
 
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Daire Hooper
 
Parametric or non parametric relationship practice problems
Ken Plummer
 
Predictive or arbitrary relationship practice problems
Ken Plummer
 
What is a one sample wilcoxon test
Ken Plummer
 
Tutorial normal v skew distributions
Ken Plummer
 
Quickreminder nature of the data (relationship)
Ken Plummer
 
Tutorial parametric v. non-parametric
Ken Plummer
 
Reporting a paired sample t test
Ken Plummer
 
Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA
Ken Plummer
 
Statistical analysis using spss
jpcagphil
 
Statistical Analysis
Stephen Taylor
 
Reporting a non parametric Friedman test in APA
Ken Plummer
 
Ad

Similar to Reporting statistics in psychology (20)

DOCX
Complete Parts A & BPart ASome questions in Part A r.docx
luellaj
 
DOCX
Quantitative data analysis
Ayuni Abdullah
 
DOCX
Part ASome questions in Part A require that you access data .docx
bridgelandying
 
PDF
Applied statistics lecture_3
Daria Bogdanova
 
PPTX
Student's T test distributions & its Applications
vidit jain
 
PPT
BBA 020
Shirali Orujlu
 
PPTX
Inferential Statistics (Melrose High School Library)
TomScudder1
 
PPTX
Chapter 2 Getting Started in Research.pptx
SamihaSalum
 
PPTX
Stats - Intro to Quantitative
Michigan State University
 
PDF
Basic Statistics in Social Science Research.pdf
kaleemullahfasihi1
 
PPT
Session 1 -Getting started with R Statistics package.ppt
SarunasDriezis1
 
DOCX
48  january 2  vol 27 no 18  2013  © NURSING STANDARD RC.docx
blondellchancy
 
PDF
Statistical Methods for Psychology 8th Edition Howell Solutions Manual
whkvfri1935
 
PDF
Lecture slides to increase understanding of statistics by all category of res...
kabiruabubakar3
 
PPTX
Hypothesis Testing
Sanju Rusara Seneviratne
 
PPT
Statistics And Correlation
pankaj prabhakar
 
DOCX
Need a nonplagiarised paper and a form completed by 1006015 before.docx
lea6nklmattu
 
DOC
PSYCH 625 Exceptional Education - snaptutorial.com
DavisMurphyB22
 
DOCX
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
daniahendric
 
PPTX
When to use, What Statistical Test for data Analysis modified.pptx
Asokan R
 
Complete Parts A & BPart ASome questions in Part A r.docx
luellaj
 
Quantitative data analysis
Ayuni Abdullah
 
Part ASome questions in Part A require that you access data .docx
bridgelandying
 
Applied statistics lecture_3
Daria Bogdanova
 
Student's T test distributions & its Applications
vidit jain
 
Inferential Statistics (Melrose High School Library)
TomScudder1
 
Chapter 2 Getting Started in Research.pptx
SamihaSalum
 
Stats - Intro to Quantitative
Michigan State University
 
Basic Statistics in Social Science Research.pdf
kaleemullahfasihi1
 
Session 1 -Getting started with R Statistics package.ppt
SarunasDriezis1
 
48  january 2  vol 27 no 18  2013  © NURSING STANDARD RC.docx
blondellchancy
 
Statistical Methods for Psychology 8th Edition Howell Solutions Manual
whkvfri1935
 
Lecture slides to increase understanding of statistics by all category of res...
kabiruabubakar3
 
Hypothesis Testing
Sanju Rusara Seneviratne
 
Statistics And Correlation
pankaj prabhakar
 
Need a nonplagiarised paper and a form completed by 1006015 before.docx
lea6nklmattu
 
PSYCH 625 Exceptional Education - snaptutorial.com
DavisMurphyB22
 
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
daniahendric
 
When to use, What Statistical Test for data Analysis modified.pptx
Asokan R
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Module 1: Determinants of Health [Tutorial Slides]
JonathanHallett4
 
PPTX
HIRSCHSPRUNG'S DISEASE(MEGACOLON): NURSING MANAGMENT.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
PPTX
PYLORIC STENOSIS: NURSING MANAGEMENT.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
PDF
Right to Information.pdf by Sapna Maurya XI D
Directorate of Education Delhi
 
PPTX
Blanket Order in Odoo 17 Purchase App - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
PDF
Stepwise procedure (Manually Submitted & Un Attended) Medical Devices Cases
MUHAMMAD SOHAIL
 
PDF
IMP NAAC REFORMS 2024 - 10 Attributes.pdf
BHARTIWADEKAR
 
PPTX
Views on Education of Indian Thinkers J.Krishnamurthy..pptx
ShrutiMahanta1
 
PPTX
ROLE OF ANTIOXIDANT IN EYE HEALTH MANAGEMENT.pptx
Subham Panja
 
PPTX
Various Psychological tests: challenges and contemporary trends in psychologi...
santoshmohalik1
 
PDF
Comprehensive Guide to Writing Effective Literature Reviews for Academic Publ...
AJAYI SAMUEL
 
PDF
FULL DOCUMENT: Read the full Deloitte and Touche audit report on the National...
Kweku Zurek
 
PPTX
THE HUMAN INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM#MLT#BCRAPC.pptx
Subham Panja
 
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ THEO LESSON TIẾNG ANH - I-LEARN SMART WORLD 7 - CẢ NĂM - CÓ ĐÁ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
PPTX
ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECTS:GASTROSCHISIS, OMPHALOCELE.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
PPTX
How to Consolidate Subscription Billing in Odoo 18 Sales
Celine George
 
PPTX
ANORECTAL MALFORMATIONS: NURSING MANAGEMENT.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
PPTX
Capitol Doctoral Presentation -July 2025.pptx
CapitolTechU
 
PPTX
Views on Education of Indian Thinkers Mahatma Gandhi.pptx
ShrutiMahanta1
 
PDF
Ziehl-Neelsen Stain: Principle, Procedu.
PRASHANT YADAV
 
Module 1: Determinants of Health [Tutorial Slides]
JonathanHallett4
 
HIRSCHSPRUNG'S DISEASE(MEGACOLON): NURSING MANAGMENT.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
PYLORIC STENOSIS: NURSING MANAGEMENT.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
Right to Information.pdf by Sapna Maurya XI D
Directorate of Education Delhi
 
Blanket Order in Odoo 17 Purchase App - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
Stepwise procedure (Manually Submitted & Un Attended) Medical Devices Cases
MUHAMMAD SOHAIL
 
IMP NAAC REFORMS 2024 - 10 Attributes.pdf
BHARTIWADEKAR
 
Views on Education of Indian Thinkers J.Krishnamurthy..pptx
ShrutiMahanta1
 
ROLE OF ANTIOXIDANT IN EYE HEALTH MANAGEMENT.pptx
Subham Panja
 
Various Psychological tests: challenges and contemporary trends in psychologi...
santoshmohalik1
 
Comprehensive Guide to Writing Effective Literature Reviews for Academic Publ...
AJAYI SAMUEL
 
FULL DOCUMENT: Read the full Deloitte and Touche audit report on the National...
Kweku Zurek
 
THE HUMAN INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM#MLT#BCRAPC.pptx
Subham Panja
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ THEO LESSON TIẾNG ANH - I-LEARN SMART WORLD 7 - CẢ NĂM - CÓ ĐÁ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECTS:GASTROSCHISIS, OMPHALOCELE.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
How to Consolidate Subscription Billing in Odoo 18 Sales
Celine George
 
ANORECTAL MALFORMATIONS: NURSING MANAGEMENT.pptx
PRADEEP ABOTHU
 
Capitol Doctoral Presentation -July 2025.pptx
CapitolTechU
 
Views on Education of Indian Thinkers Mahatma Gandhi.pptx
ShrutiMahanta1
 
Ziehl-Neelsen Stain: Principle, Procedu.
PRASHANT YADAV
 

Reporting statistics in psychology

  • 1. Reporting Statistics in Psychology This document contains general guidelines for the reporting of statistics in psychology re- search. The details of statistical reporting vary slightly among different areas of science and also among different journals. General Guidelines Rounding Numbers For numbers greater than 100, report to the nearest whole number (e.g., M = 6254). For numbers between 10 and 100, report to one decimal place (e.g., M = 23.4). For numbers be- tween 0.10 and 10, report to two decimal places (e.g., M = 4.34, SD = 0.93). For numbers less than 0.10, report to three decimal places, or however many digits you need to have a non-zero number (e.g., M = 0.014, SEM = 0.0004). For numbers... Round to... SPSS Report Greater than 100 Whole number 1034.963 1035 10 - 100 1 decimal place 11.4378 11.4 0.10 - 10 2 decimal places 4.3682 4.37 0.001 - 0.10 3 decimal places 0.0352 0.035 Less than 0.001 As many digits as needed for non-zero 0.00038 0.0004 Do not report any decimal places if you are reporting something that can only be a whole number. For example, the number of participants in a study should be reported as N = 5, not N = 5.0. Report exact p-values (not p < .05), even for non-significant results. Round as above, unless SPSS gives a p-value of .000; then report p < .001. Two-tailed p-values are assumed. If you are reporting a one-tailed p-value, you must say so. Omit the leading zero from p-values, correlation coefficients (r), partial eta-squared (ηp2), and other numbers that cannot ever be greater than 1.0 (e.g., p = .043, not p = 0.043). Statistical Abbreviations Abbreviations using Latin letters, such as mean (M) and standard deviation (SD), should be italicised, while abbreviations using Greek letters, such as partial eta-squared (ηp2), should not be italicised and can be written out in full if you cannot use Greek letters. There should be a space before and after equal signs. The abbreviations should only be used inside of pa- rentheses; spell out the names otherwise. Inferential statistics should generally be reported in the style of: “statistic(degrees of freedom) = value, p = value, effect size statistic = value” Statistic Example Mean and standard deviation M = 3.45, SD = 1.21 Mann-Whitney U = 67.5, p = .034, r = .38 Wilcoxon signed-ranks Z = 4.21, p < .001 Sign test Z = 3.47, p = .001 t-test t(19) = 2.45, p = .031, d = 0.54 ANOVA F(2, 1279) = 6.15, p = .002, ηp2 = 0.010 Pearson’s correlation r(1282) = .13, p < .001 1
  • 2. Reporting Statistics in Psychology Descriptive Statistics Means and standard deviations should be given either in the text or in a table, but not both. The average age of participants was 25.5 years (SD = 7.94). The age of participants ranged from 18 to 70 years (M = 25.5, SD = 7.94). Age was non-normally distributed, with skewness of 1.87 (SE = 0.05) and kurtosis of 3.93 (SE = 0.10) Participants were 98 men and 132 women aged 17 to 25 years (men: M = 19.2, SD = 2.32; women: M = 19.6, SD = 2.54). Non-parametric tests Do not report means and standard deviations for non-parametric tests. Report the median and range in the text or in a table. The statistics U and Z should be capitalised and italicised. A measure of effect size, r, can be calculated by dividing Z by the square root of N (r = Z / √N). Mann-Whitney Test (2 Independent Samples...) A Mann-Whitney test indicated that self-rated attractiveness was greater for women who were not using oral contraceptives (Mdn = 5) than for women who were using oral contraceptives (Mdn = 4), U = 67.5, p = .034, r = .38. Wilcoxon Signed-ranks Test (2 Related Samples...) A Wilcoxon Signed-ranks test indicated that femininity was preferred more in female faces (Mdn = 0.85) than in male faces (Mdn = 0.65), Z = 4.21, p < .001, r = .76. 2
  • 3. Reporting Statistics in Psychology Sign Test (2 Related Samples...) A sign test indicated that femininity was preferred more in female faces than in male faces, Z = 3.47, p = .001. T-tests Report degrees of freedom in parentheses. The statistics t, p and Cohen’s d should be re- ported and italicised. One-sample t-test One-sample t-test indicated that femininity preferences were greater than the chance level of 3.5 for female faces (M = 4.50, SD = 0.70), t(30) = 8.01, p < .001, d = 1.44, but not for male faces (M = 3.46, SD = 0.73), t(30) = -0.32, p = .75, d = 0.057. The number of masculine faces chosen out of 20 possible was compared to the chance value of 10 using a one-sample t-test. Masculine faces were chosen more often than chance, t(76) = 4.35, p = .004, d = 0.35. Paired-samples t-test Report paired-samples t-tests in the same way as one-sample t-tests. A paired-samples t-test indicated that scores were significantly higher for the pathogen subscale (M = 26.4, SD = 7.41) than for the sexual subscale (M = 18.0, SD = 9.49), t(721) = 23.3, p < .001, d = 0.87. 3
  • 4. Reporting Statistics in Psychology Scores on the pathogen subscale (M = 26.4, SD = 7.41) were higher than scores on the sexual subscale (M = 18.0, SD = 9.49), t(721) = 23.3, p < .001, d = 0.87. A one- tailed p-value is reported due to the strong prediction of this effect. Independent-samples t-test An independent-samples t-test indicated that scores were significantly higher for women (M = 27.0, SD = 7.21) than for men (M = 24.2, SD = 7.69), t(734) = 4.30, p < .001, d = 0.35. If Levene’s test for equality of variances is significant, report the statistics for the row equal variances not assumed with the altered degrees of freedom rounded to the nearest whole number. Scores on the pathogen subscale were higher for women (M = 27.0, SD = 7.21) than for men (M = 24.2, SD = 7.69), t(340) = 4.30, p < .001, d = 0.35. Levene’s test indicated unequal variances (F = 3.56, p = .043), so degrees of freedom were adjusted from 734 to 340. ANOVAs ANOVAs have two degrees of freedom to report. Report the between-groups df first and the within-groups df second, separated by a comma and a space (e.g., F(1, 237) = 3.45). The measure of effect size, partial eta-squared (ηp2), may be written out or abbreviated, omits the leading zero and is not italicised. One-way ANOVAs and Post-hocs Analysis of variance showed a main effect of self-rated attractiveness (SRA) on preferences for femininity in female faces, F(2, 1279) = 6.15, p = .002, ηp2 = .010. Post- hoc analyses using Tukey’s HSD indicated that femininity preferences were lower for participants with low SRA than for participants with average SRA (p = .014) and high SRA (p = .004), but femininity preferences did not differ significantly between participants with average and high SRA (p = .82). 4
  • 5. Reporting Statistics in Psychology 2-way Factorial ANOVAs A 3x2 ANOVA with self-rated attractiveness (low, average, high) and oral contraceptive use (true, false) as between-subjects factors revealed a main effects of SRA, F(2, 1276) = 6.11, p = .002, ηp2 = .009, and oral contraceptive use, F(1, 1276) = 4.38, p = .037, ηp2 = 0.003. These main effects were not qualified by an interaction between SRA and oral contraceptive use, F(2, 1276) = 0.43, p = .65, ηp2 = .001. 3-way ANOVAs and Higher Although some textbooks suggest that you report all main effects and interactions, even if not significant, this reduces the understandability of the results of a complex design (i.e. 3-way or higher). Report all significant effects and all predicted effects, even if not significant. If there are more than two non-significant effects that are irrelevant to your main hypotheses (e.g. you predicted an interaction among three factors, but did not predict any main effects or 2- way interactions), you can summarise them as in the example below. A mixed-design ANOVA with sex of face (male, female) as a within-subjects factor and self-rated attractiveness (low, average, high) and oral contraceptive use (true, false) as between-subjects factors revealed a main effect of sex of face, F(1, 1276) = 1372, p < .001, ηp2 = .52. This was qualified by interactions between sex of face and SRA, F(2, 1276) = 6.90, p = .001, ηp2 = .011, and between sex of face and oral contraceptive use, F(1, 1276) = 5.02, p = .025, ηp2 = .004. The predicted interaction among sex of face, SRA and oral contraceptive use was not significant, F(2, 1276) = 0.06, p = .94, ηp2 < .001. All other main effects and interactions were non-significant and irrelevant to our hypotheses, all F ≤ 0.94, p ≥ .39, ηp2 ≤ .001. Violations of Sphericity and Greenhouse-Geisser Corrections ANOVAs are not robust to violations of sphericity, but can be easily corrected. For each within-subjects factor with more than two levels, check if Mauchly’s test is significant. If so, report chi-squared (χ2), degrees of freedom, p and epsilon (ε) as below and report the Greenhouse-Geisser corrected values for any effects involving this factor (rounded to the appropriate decimal place). SPSS will report a chi-squared of .000 and no p-value for within- subjects factors with only two levels; corrections are not needed. 5
  • 6. Reporting Statistics in Psychology Data were analysed using a mixed-design ANOVA with a within-subjects factor of subscale (pathogen, sexual, moral) and a between-subject factor of sex (male, female). Mauchly’s test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been violated (χ2(2) = 16.8, p < .001), therefore degrees of freedom were corrected using Greenhouse-Geisser estimates of sphericity (ε = 0.98). Main effects of subscale, F(1.91, 1350.8) = 378, p < .001, ηp2 = .35, and sex, F(1, 709) = 78.8, p < .001, ηp2 = . 10, were qualified by an interaction between subscale and sex, F(1.91, 1351) = 30.4, p < .001, ηp2 = .041. ANCOVA An ANCOVA [between-subjects factor: sex (male, female); covariate: age] revealed no main effects of sex, F(1, 732) = 2.00, p = .16, ηp2 = .003, or age, F(1, 732) = 3.25, p = .072, ηp2 = .004, and no interaction between sex and age, F(1, 732) = 0.016, p = .90, ηp2 < .001. The predicted main effect of sex was not significant, F(1, 732) = 2.00, p = .16, ηp2 = .003, nor was the predicted main effect of age, F(1, 732) = 3.25, p = .072, ηp2 = .004. The interaction between sex and age were also not significant, F(1, 732) = 0.016, p = .90, ηp2 < .001. 6
  • 7. Reporting Statistics in Psychology Correlations Italicise r and p. Omit the leading zero from r. Preferences for femininity in male and female faces were positively correlated, Pearson’s r(1282) = .13, p < .001. References American Psychological Association. (2005). Concise Rules of APA Style. Washington, DC: APA Publications. Field, A. P., & Hole, G. J. (2003). How to design and report experiments. London: Sage Pub- lications. 7